Lawyers for anti-abortion doctor slam ‘vague’ charges

On Monday, at the Health Professions Council of SA's(HPCSA) disciplinary request against De Vos it developed that. The attorneys for hostile to abortionist Dr Jacques de Vos have named the charges by the Health Professions Council of SA as "unclear" and the postponement of right around three years in charging him "unnecessary".

De Vos, 32, spoke to free by law office De Wet Wepener Attorneys and senior guidance Keith Matthee, arrived in high temp water for supposedly deterring a pregnant lady from ending her pregnancy and comparing it to the "executing of a person".

De Vos was accused of, among others, complementing his own or strict convictions over the patient's privileges and for coming up short/fail to stay target when pushing the utilization of contraceptives. He could conceivably be endorsed with a notice, a fine, suspension, or have his enlistment with the HPCSA ended.

Matthee contended that the charges were unclear and the postponement of just about three years was unnecessary. He said the disciplinary was being utilized against De Vos to prevent him from rehearsing as a specialist as 2 Military Hospital's pediatrics obstetrics and gynecology offices wouldn't approve the disciplinary procedure, refering to moral reasons. HPCSA proforma complainant Zolile Gajana submitted to the panel that all pertinent documentation was given to the lawyers and that the procedure was gotten under way in May a year ago.

Gajana said the HPCSA didn't suspend De Vos; it was deliberate as he was as yet required to finish an obligatory period with the obstetrics and gynecology division to proceed onward to his locale administration. The disciplinary board of trustees needed to concentrate on the value of the charges as the onus was on De Vos to demonstrate his lead was not unbecoming of a specialist since he could go to another gathering on the off chance that he believed he had been dealt with unjustifiably.

Contentions are set to proceed with today.