SASSA to brief media on beneficiaries suspected of having additional sources of income

The South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) CEO, Themba Matlou, is expected to brief the media on Monday on the social grants review process currently being undertaken by the agency.

According to SASSA, the review is focused on targeted beneficiaries suspected of having “additional sources of income that was not disclosed to the Agency”.

“In April 2025, SASSA announced an ongoing scheduled payment delays to targeted social grants beneficiaries who need to visit local offices to confirm changes in their financial circumstances and update their personal details to address potential inclusion errors in the current social security system. This was done after the Agency had collaborated with registered Credit Bureaus and approximately 210 000 social grant beneficiaries were flagged to be receiving income that was not truthfully disclosed,” said SASSA in a statement.

SASSA LOGO


SASSA bemoaned the “public commentary and misrepresentation from various interest groups and the public at large, casting aspersions on SASSA’s efforts to ascertain eligibility” of some beneficiaries and initiatives to “curb fraud in the grants system”.

“In accordance with the Social Assistance legislative framework, beneficiaries are legally required to fully disclose all sources of income during their initial application. They are also obliged to inform SASSA of any changes to their financial circumstances after their application has been approved. SASSA has undertaken a review of its database and grant administration processes to root out fraud and ensure that assistance reaches those who are eligible.’’

“These reviews are specifically focused on individuals who appear to be active in the labour market and whose incomes are close to or exceed the means test threshold; particularly where such income was not disclosed at the time of application or where changes in circumstances were not reported thereafter,” it added.

Meanwhile, the Western Cape’s Standing committee on Social Development chairperson, Wendy Kaizer-Philander expressed concern about the ongoing challenges facing social grant beneficiaries

‘’As it stands, beneficiaries are being instructed to present themselves in-person at their nearest SASSA local office for eligibility verification. Failure to comply results in grant suspensions and, in some cases, permanent lapsing of grants. This in-person requirement is causing distress, particularly to the elderly, people with disabilities, and beneficiaries living in remote areas without access to transport or nearby offices.’’

‘’A troubling example includes a double amputee who has been receiving a disability grant since 2011. Despite having completed a review in November 2024, he was told to return to his former employer - whom he left in 2009 - to obtain a letter confirming his unemployment status. Such demands are both unreasonable and inhumane, and they do not reflect an understanding of the lived realities of grant recipients. While we recognise the need for accountability, the manner in which this review is being conducted lacks transparency, planning, and sensitivity,’’ added Kaizer-Philander.

She raised concerns at how the implementation of this process is negatively affecting some of the most vulnerable members of societ and has request a number of corrective action from SASSA and the Department of Social Development:

1. Temporary suspension of in-person verification for the elderly, persons with disabilities, and rural beneficiaries until a more accessible process is implemented.

2. Development of mobile verification teams to visit rural areas and homes of those unable to travel.

3. Clear communication strategy in all official languages to inform beneficiaries of verification timelines and requirements.

4. Urgent review of verification requirements, such as outdated employer letters, to ensure that requirements are realistic.

5. Community-based partnerships, involving local clinics, churches, and NGOs, to assist with the verification process where SASSA offices are not accessible.

 

Done By: Mitchum George

Comments